| 6c924f48 | 15-May-2010 |
Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org> |
PCFieldSplit: remove command line versus code conflict
* Factor out PCFieldSplitSetRuntimeSplits_Private()
* Splits defined using the options database become permanent, subsequent calls to PCFiel
PCFieldSplit: remove command line versus code conflict
* Factor out PCFieldSplitSetRuntimeSplits_Private()
* Splits defined using the options database become permanent, subsequent calls to PCFieldSplitSet(IS|Fields) will not create new splits. This is a problem that may be slightly confusing, so such cases are logged with PetscInfo.
* Add tests of setting options with both code-defined (string) and options database (numeric) prefixes.
* Always use PetscSNPrintf() for creating prefixes (note that it now involves an additional user-defined string)
Hg-commit: 978e0f333fff90b0c3226a36fdc401b53b28895e
show more ...
|
| 3b3f6333 | 13-May-2010 |
Barry Smith <bsmith@mcs.anl.gov> |
do not allow setting a new PCSetOperator() with a different size after it has been used From: Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> Subject: [petsc-maint #46134] Re: [petsc-users] Error usin
do not allow setting a new PCSetOperator() with a different size after it has been used From: Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> Subject: [petsc-maint #46134] Re: [petsc-users] Error using the same ksp with different operator sizes Date: May 13, 2010 9:57:22 AM CDT To: Aron Ahmadia <aron.ahmadia@kaust.edu.sa>, petsc-maint Maintenance <petsc-maint@mcs.anl.gov> Reply-To: petsc-maint Maintenance <petsc-maint@mcs.anl.gov>, Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Aron Ahmadia <aron.ahmadia@kaust.edu.sa>wrote:
In that case, shouldn't you throw the error when they try to set the new operator?
Hg-commit: afd8a6ab1b20bc643b64afec12cd81f0ec325471
show more ...
|